Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1434

reference
101-tree-1
name
1434
tree-preservation-order

undefined

101-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003335 50.869067)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003292 50.869062,-1.003294 50.869070,-1.003300 50.869078,-1.003309 50.869084,-1.003321 50.869088,-1.003334 50.869089,-1.003348 50.869088,-1.003360 50.869084,-1.003369 50.869079,-1.003375 50.869071,-1.003378 50.869063,-1.003376 50.869054,-1.003370 50.869047,-1.003360 50.869041,-1.003349 50.869037,-1.003336 50.869035,-1.003310 50.869040,-1.003301 50.869046,-1.003295 50.869054,-1.003292 50.869062)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL